On August 7, 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order on Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking that reshapes how federal agencies award and manage discretionary grants. This order is expected to significantly affect how cities, counties, and nonprofits pursue and maintain federal funding.
At the Southwest Georgia Regional Commission, we work closely with our member governments and community partners to secure resources that strengthen our region. Understanding these new changes will be critical for staying competitive in the evolving federal funding landscape.
Key Changes to Federal Grantmaking
- Increased Political Oversight: Each federal agency must now designate a senior presidential appointee to review funding opportunities and discretionary awards.
- Grant programs must align with administration policy priorities and the national interest as defined by the White House.
What this means: Applications will be judged not just on technical merit, but also on how well they support federal policy priorities.
Restrictions on Certain Activities
Discretionary grants cannot fund programs that:
- Use racial preferences or race-based selection criteria.
- Challenge the concept of a male-female sex binary or promote gender ideology programs.
- Facilitate or support illegal immigration.
- Promote activities deemed inconsistent with “American values” or that compromise public safety.
What this means:
Programs centered on DEI, gender identity, or immigration services will no longer be eligible for discretionary federal funding.
Preference for Efficient and Broad Distribution of Funds
- Agencies are instructed to favor organizations with lower indirect costs (administrative/overhead rates).
- Funding should be spread across a wider range of recipients, not concentrated among a few repeat awardees.
- For research, emphasis will be placed on institutions that produce rigorous, reproducible results, rather than relying on reputation alone.
What this means: Smaller nonprofits, community-based organizations, and local governments may gain a competitive edge over large institutions with higher overhead costs.
Stronger Accountability and Evaluation
- Grant proposals must include clear benchmarks for success and measurable outcomes.
- Scientific research proposals must commit to “Gold Standard Science,” emphasizing reproducibility and rigor.
- Agencies must review awards annually for progress and alignment with agency priorities.
What this means:
Applicants will need strong evaluation plans and measurable performance indicators to remain competitive.
Grant Termination for Convenience
- All discretionary grants must include provisions allowing the federal government to terminate funding at any time if a project no longer aligns with agency priorities or the national interest.
- Agencies must update existing awards to include this authority.
What this means: Even awarded grants carry greater risk. Local governments and nonprofits should avoid over-reliance on a single federal grant stream and have contingency plans in place.
Administration’s Current Grantmaking Priorities
Based on the Executive Order, the administration has outlined the following key priorities for federal funding:
- Alignment with the President’s policy agenda and the national interest.
- Avoidance of funding programs tied to DEI, critical race theory, gender ideology, or immigration services.
- Cost efficiency, with preference given to organizations that maintain low administrative overhead.
- Broad distribution of funds across a diverse range of recipients, not just large or repeat institutions.
- Strong commitment to accountability, measurable outcomes, and Gold Standard Science.
- Plain language applications designed to reduce complexity and lower barriers to entry.
- Enhanced interagency coordination to eliminate duplicative funding opportunities.
What This Means for Southwest Georgia
For local governments, nonprofits, and educational partners in our region, this executive order means both new opportunities and new challenges:
- Projects tied to public safety, economic development, housing, infrastructure, and rural development are more likely to align with administration priorities.
- Organizations with low overhead costs and strong accountability systems will be well-positioned to compete.
- Programs previously focused on DEI, immigration, or gender initiatives will need to reassess funding strategies.
- Federal funds may be less stable due to expanded termination clauses, making funding diversification more important than ever.
To stay competitive, grant applications must be
aligned with national priorities, fiscally lean, results-driven, and clearly measurable.